{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","uuid":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯作品集交往行为理论第一卷行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","isbns":["9787208153547"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":560,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81%E9%9B%86%20%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8D%B7%20%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":141,"pdf_page":147,"physical_index":147,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ce811e70f3762bc78123195522119792f8e2f5c44a6455fd2ccdaba7d9c90462"},"chapter":"交往行为理论","content":"(a)二元论的科学概念\n\n理解问题内部潜藏着一种二元论的科学概念。历史主义(狄尔泰，米施）和新康德主义(文德尔班，李凯尔特)在解释与理解相冲突(Erklärenvs.Verstehen)的层面上为自然科学和社会科学建构起一种二元论。这是围绕着解释与理解所展开的“第一轮”争论，今天已没有什么实际意义。176但是，随着社会学对现象学、语言分析哲学以及解释学的接受，紧接着胡塞尔一舒茨、维特根斯坦一温奇以及海德格尔一伽达默尔又展开了一场争论，从而使得社会科学相对于典型的自然科学，比如物理学，在交往经验的方法论作用方面获得了一种特殊的地位。相对而言，经验主义科学理论则对在维也纳新实证主义那里已经得到阐明的同一性科学概念加以捍卫。这场争论除了个别人还在继续关注之外，可以说已告一段落。177主要把阿贝尔(Th.Abel)178当作依靠对象的批评者误以为理解(Verstehen)是移情(Empathie)，是一种设身处地地想象一个陌生主体的心灵状态的神秘行为；在经验主义前提下，他们必定要用一种关于理解的移情理论来对交往经验重新加以解释。 179\n\n一、导论：对合理性问题的理解\n\n141","previous_page":140,"next_page":142}