{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","uuid":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯作品集交往行为理论第一卷行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","isbns":["9787208153547"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":560,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81%E9%9B%86%20%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8D%B7%20%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":392,"pdf_page":398,"physical_index":398,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fab2e0c64b747235115159cb9d308b63d35ccd2de834d008daf80a2cb1200c15"},"chapter":"交往行为理论","content":"也可能是这样的：\n\n(9”)不，你根本就是言不由衷。\n\n在上述两种情况下，命题(9）分别被认为是记述式的命题和表现式的命题。很显然，否定了陈述“p”，并不等于否定信念“daβp”；反之亦然，否定了命题(9”),并不等于否定命题(9′)。听众可以假定，如果“S”断言“p”，那么，他也就相信“daβp”。但这样并没有触及如下内容：真实性要求涉及的是事态“p”的实际存在，而真诚性要求仅仅关系到意见或信念“daβp”的表达。谋杀者如果坦白的话，可能是言出心声，但他并没有准备说出真相；他也可能在没有准备的情况下说出真相，尽管他为了隐瞒犯罪过程而在说谎。掌握了足够证据的法官可能认为真诚的表达是不真实的，也可能认为真实的表达是不真诚的。\n\n相反，图根哈特（E.Tugendhat）试图仅仅分析其中的一个有效性要求。60他加入了在维特根斯坦的私人语言论(Privatsprachenargument)基础上展开的广泛的争论，想由此来阐明经验命题（10）和（11）涉及的是断言性有效性要求：\n\n(10)我有疼痛。\n\n(11)他害怕被强暴。\n\n这与具有同样内涵的陈述命题（12）和（13）是一致的：\n\n(12）他有疼痛。\n\n(13)她害怕被强暴。\n\n其中，第一人称代词和第三人称代词所指涉的应当是同一个人。\n\n如果图根哈特的上述观点是对的，那么，否定命题(10）和(11)，也就等于否定了命题(12)和(13)。这样，在真实性要求之外，再设定一个真诚性要求，也就是多余了。\n\n392\n\n交往行为理论（第一卷）","previous_page":391,"next_page":393}