{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","uuid":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯作品集交往行为理论第一卷行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","isbns":["9787208153547"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":560,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81%E9%9B%86%20%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8D%B7%20%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":417,"pdf_page":423,"physical_index":423,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"90f7464e5973c537f1e0ebc6a231b8a9e2f2a939b2e7b6021044ab34d448966c"},"chapter":"交往行为理论","content":"相对性观点并不是要把言语行为的意义还原成言语者在偶然语境中的意图。塞尔没有断定，语言表达的意义永远都是相对的；因为，语言表达的意义，并没有随着偶然语境的变换而改变。表达字面意义的相对性，我们是通过一种追问发现的，而这种追问的方式不是轻易可以掌握的。它所面对的是一些客观问题。这些客观问题动摇了我们的自然世界观。在认识规范化语言表达的接受条件时，这种基本的背景知识必须不动声色地起到补充作用，这样，听众就可以理解规范化语言表达的字面意义。这些背景知识具有一些特殊性：比如，它是一种潜在的知识，不能用有限的命题来加以揭示；它是一种具有整体论结构的知识，各个环节之间相互纠缠；作为一种知识，我们如果不能有意识地揭示它，并对它加以质疑，我们就无法把握它。如果哲学家还继续追问的话，这种知识就表现为常识的明确性(Common-sense-Gewiβheiten)，对此，摩尔(G.E.Moore)曾经表示出浓厚的兴趣， 89维特根斯坦在其“论明确性”(ÜberGewiβheit）中也曾有过论述。\n\n维特根斯坦认为，这种明确性是我们世界观的组成部分，“它们扎根在我的所有问题和答案当中，而我却无法触及它们”。90看起来比较荒唐的是这样一些看法，它们和维特根斯坦的基本观点有些出入：\n\n三、第一卷的中间考察:社会行为、目的行为以及交往\n\n417","previous_page":416,"next_page":418}