{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","uuid":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯作品集交往行为理论第一卷行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","isbns":["9787208153547"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":560,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81%E9%9B%86%20%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8D%B7%20%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":445,"pdf_page":451,"physical_index":451,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"05ba3110defbe9f3fea38fbe2033c2ede03b577344e632b060f3f53835118341"},"chapter":"交往行为理论","content":"(c)卢卡奇还从另外一个角度来借用形式合理性概念。对于卢卡奇来说，形式合理性概念在商品形式与康德所分析的知性认识形式之间构成一座桥梁。沿着这样一条思路，卢卡奇重新把他所借用的对象性形式概念引回到认识论语境当中，以便从黑格尔批判康德这样一种哲学角度展开物化批判。他从黑格尔那里接受了有关合理组织起来的生活关系的总体性概念，并把它当作社会合理化的非理性尺度。当然，有了这个概念，卢卡奇也就悄悄地对韦伯的核心观点进行了更正，即认为随着各自具有自身规律的文化价值领域的分离，形而上学所理解的理性同一性彻底崩溃了，也就是说，再也无法用辩证法加以重建了。\n\n关于(a):卢卡奇根据马克思对商品形式的分析阐明了他的物化概念；他提到了马克思在《资本论》37第1卷中描述商品拜物教特征的著名段落：\n\n商品形态所以是神秘的，不过因为这个形态在人们眼中，把自己的劳动的社会性质，当作劳动产品自身的物质性质，当作这各种物品的社会的自然属性来反映，从而，也把生产者对社会总劳动的社会关系，当作一种不是存在于生产者之间，而是存在于客观界各种物品之间的社会关系来反映。就是由于这种转换，所以劳动产品成了商品，成了可以感觉而又超于感觉的东西或社会的东西。……那只是人们自已的一定的社会关系，但在这里，在人看来，它竟然取得了一种物品关系的幻想形式。38\n\n四、从卢卡奇到阿多诺:作为物化的合理化\n\n445","previous_page":444,"next_page":446}