{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","id":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","uuid":"d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title":"哈贝马斯作品集 交往行为理论 第一卷 行为合理性与社会合理化","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯作品集交往行为理论第一卷行为合理性与社会合理化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153547","isbns":["9787208153547"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":560,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81%E9%9B%86%20%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8D%B7%20%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%90%88%E7%90%86%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d6c14ac7-04dd-43ff-b8c8-f495a729ff0a/search"},"page":{"printed_page":499,"pdf_page":505,"physical_index":505,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b8f5d408bbd2ee2793f0c434cfd65756c83e5928c7baea5a210e915859f7a009"},"chapter":"交往行为理论","content":"93 Horkheimer, (1967), 66.\n\n94 Ebd., 82.\n\n95 Ebd., 80.\n\n96这一点在第二代法兰克福学派人物那里得到了认真地对待，请参阅阿佩尔、哈贝马斯、施耐德巴赫以及维尔默等人的著作。\n\n97Horkheimer,(1967),83f.；关于早期批判理论的经验概念，请参阅W. Bonβ,Die Einübung desTatsachenblicks, Ffm., 1982\n\n98 Bernstein, (1979).\n\n99 Habermas, (1968b).\n\n100 Adorno, (1973b).\n\n101 关于交换合理性在阿多诺著作中的次要意义,请参阅J.F.Schmucker,Adorno-LogikdesZerfalls, Stuttgart, 1977, 105ff.。\n\n102J. E.Schmucker,(1977),106:“自我捍卫的辩证法在现代交换社会成员那里贯穿在交换过程当中，相反，对于奥德赛的主体性结构而言，它是从自然控制原则那里推导出来的。”\n\n103 Horkheimer, (1967), 94.\n\n104 Horkheimer, Adorno, (1947), 45.\n\n105Ebd., 70f.。\n\n106关于真理与自然历史在阿多诺那里的关系，请参阅F.Grenz,(1974),57f.。\n\n107 Horkheimer, (1967), 163f..\n\n108 Ebd., 162.\n\n109 Ebd.,164.\n\n110 Ebd., 165.\n\n111 当然，模仿并不是像G. Rohrmoser 在其《批判理论的贫困》(Das Elendder KritichenTheorie,Freiburg,1970,25)中所说的那样，“是人对自然的直接参与和重复形式”；但是，自然退缩成为工具理性的干预，对它的超越力量的适应充满了恐惧，而在恐惧当中，模仿使我们想起了主体与自然之间的自由交换模式：“平等结构，综合的直接模仿以及间接模仿，盲目生命中与事物的一致以及科学概念结构中物化的比拟等，都是恐惧的模仿”(Horkheimer,Adorno,1947,213)。模仿行为，或者说“与他者之间建立起紧密而有机的联系”，都是出于恐惧，这点并没有让模仿充当原始理性的代言人，因为原始理性的位置早就被工具理性篡夺并占据了。施默克没有注意到这一点，请参阅其著作，(1977),29，第63个注释，相似的还有G. Kaiser,Benjamin,Adorno,Ffm.,\n\n四、从卢卡奇到阿多诺:作为物化的合理化\n\n499","previous_page":498,"next_page":500}