{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":120,"pdf_page":139,"physical_index":139,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2268952db349b093391e46d98f6fa92d7bb90224f3583bcbdb99fd305784fad4"},"chapter":"第一章 自在之差异","content":"对海德格尔的差异暂学的评注。—在《存在与时间》(L'Être et le temps)与《形而上学是什么?》(Qu’est-ce que lamétaphysique?)之后,那些主要误解—其已经被海德格尔揭露为对其哲学的曲解—很可能就是针对着这一点：海德格尔的不(NE-PAS)不是指向存在中的否定之物，而是指向作为差异的存在；不是指向否定，而是指向发问。当萨特(Sartre)在《存在与虚无》(L'Être et le néant)的开篇分析拷问(interrogation)时，他将其当作了一种[90]否定之物与否定性之发现的预备性工作(【译按】参萨特，《存在与虚无》，陈宣良等译，杜小真校，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007，页28—31)。这可以说是与海德格尔的方法截然相反。但实际上，这里谈不到有什么误解，因为萨特并没有打算评注海德格尔的哲学。不过，从《知觉现象学》(Phénoménologiede la perception)开始，在谈到“褶子”或“襞”(对立于萨特的“洞孔”和“非存在的小湖泊”[【译按】参萨特，《存在与虚无》，前揭，页49、47])时，在遗著《可见的与不可见的》(Le visible et l'invisible)中重又回到一种差异与发问的存在论时，梅洛-庞蒂(Merleau-Pon-ty)无疑更为切实地受到了海德格尔的启发。\n\n在我们看来，海德格尔的论点可以被总结为以下几条：(1)\n\n120\n\n差异与重复\n\n①【译按】参柏拉图，《美诺》，84b以下。","previous_page":119,"next_page":121}