{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":15,"pdf_page":34,"physical_index":34,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"184d53e3c2369ece354fa4b2bba8d327ed5c41706bd405d0ff402e68e592a6a5"},"chapter":"差异与重复","content":"克尔凯郭尔、尼采、贝玑的重复哲学纲要\n\n一股共通的力量贯穿着克尔凯郭尔(Kierkegaard)和尼采②(为了形成牧师、敌基督与天主教徒的三部曲，贝玑也应当加入进来。他们三者中的每一个都以自己的方式使重复不仅成为了语言与思想的本己强力，成为了一种悲怆和一种高级病理学，而且还成为了未来哲学的基本范畴。「13]他们三者中的每一个都有一种与自身相对应的圣约[Testament]、戏剧[Théâtre|和戏剧构想，以及一个在这出戏剧中担当重复之主人公的杰出人物：约伯一亚伯拉罕、狄奥尼索斯一查拉图斯特拉、圣女贞德一克利奥)。他们三者间的差别重要、显而易见，又众所周知。但什么也不能消抹掉围绕着重复思想发生的这一奇特相遇(rencontre):他们将重复与所有一般性形式对立了起来。而且，他们并不是以隐喻的方式使用“重复”一词。相反，他们紧扣字眼地来使用它，并使它融入到他们的风格当中。人们能够且应当首先用标号列出那些表明了他们三者重合之处的主要命题：\n\n导论：重复与差异\n\n15\n\n①【译按】参 Gilles Deleuze,《扎赫尔-马佐赫介绍：冷酷与残忍》(Présentation de Sacher-Masoch. Le froid et le cruel , Paris, Les éditions de Minuit, 2007) , 页 71—79。\n\n②【译按】德勒兹的这一论断无疑呼应着他的老师瓦尔(JeanWahl)的下述论断：“我们知道会有另一位(对克尔凯郭尔一无所知的)思想家看出克尔凯郭尔所描述的那种被他长期欲求的运动(因为上帝创造了世界，所以我们要向世界说‘是’)的不可能性，这位思想家会说：因为上帝死了，所以我们要向世界说是’……但是，尼采与克尔凯郭尔的不同之处并没有遮蔽他们的相似之处，而且，这种相似之处或许触及了他们那也许是同一的本质” (Introduction à Crainte et tremblement, Paris, Montaigne, 1946 ,p. XXIV) 。","previous_page":14,"next_page":16}