{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":168,"pdf_page":187,"physical_index":187,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f56df391b2dd574ad8232563d7f22cd3688993b13b0420b602fe665054e18e69"},"chapter":"第二章 自为之重复","content":"从这种观点看来，我们应当区分出若于种无法调和的可能重复：(1)一种是周期内部的重复。它取决于前两个时代相互重复的方式，或者不如说，取决于前两个时代重复同一样“东西”，亦即将来的行动或事件的方式。约阿希姆尤其持这种观点，他还制作了一个《旧约》与《新约》之间的一致性的一览表;但这一论点还没有能够超越反思的种种简单类比；(2)一种是循环的重复。依循这一重复，人们假定在第三个时代的终点与解体的端点处，一切都会从第一个时代重新开始：诸类比因而是建立在两种周期循环之间的(维柯)：(3)但是，关键在于：有没有一种专属于第三个时代的重复？有没有一种称得上是永恒回归的重复？因为前两个时代所重复的是某种只在第三个时代中显身的东西；但在第三个时代中，这个“东西”[125]是自在地重复的。两个“意谓”已然是重复性的东西了，但被意谓者本身是纯粹的重复。这种被构想为第三种状态之中的永恒回归的重复恰恰能够在纠正周期内部的假设的同时反驳循环假设。实际上，一方面，前两个环节中的重复所表现的不再是反思的种种类比，而是一些行动的条件，永恒回归正是在这些条件下被切实地生产出来；另一方面，这前两个环节并不回归，它们反而被第三个环节中的永恒回归的再造消除了。从这两种观点来看，尼采用“他的”构想来反对任何的循环构想是有其深刻的理由的(参《克略纳版著作集·1881一1885年作品与手稿》[Schriften und Entwürfe aus den Jahren 1881-1885, in Werke, Bd. 12,Leipzig 1901 ] , § 106) 。\n\n168\n\n差异与重复","previous_page":167,"next_page":169}