{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":188,"pdf_page":207,"physical_index":207,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6028f73c03bf38f5490397b65d549528f4b9ced8c9de0ea0607874df6882f284"},"chapter":"第二章 自为之重复","content":"188\n\n差异与重复\n\n① 拉康在两篇极为重要的文章中点明了诸系列的实存：一篇是前面已经引用了的《被窃的信》(第一系列：“国王一王后一大臣”，第二系列：“警察一大臣一迪潘”)；一篇是评论“鼠人”的《神经官能症患者的个体神话》(Le mythe individuel du névrosé, C. D.U.)(双亲的系列和子女对待双亲的系列在不同的状况下调动了债务、朋友、贫穷的女人和富有的女人)。每个系列中的元素和关系都是根据它们那相对于始终在移置的潜能对象的位置被规定的：第一个例子中的信，第二个例子中的债务。——“不仅仅是一个主体，而是卷入主体间性中的多个主体排进了队伍……能指的移置决定(转下页注)","previous_page":187,"next_page":189}