{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":229,"pdf_page":248,"physical_index":248,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0b7a6ca808f48cc06c3b407e54b8dbcf3af99da4a4540c75e332d934733a39aa"},"chapter":"第三章 思想的形象","content":"第一公设:Cogitatio natura universalis[拉:普遍的自然思维]原则\n\n很多人都津津有味地说着：人人都知道“这个”(ceci)，人人都承认这个，没人能够否定这个。（只要没有哪个讨厌的谈判对手站出来顶嘴，说他不愿就这样被代表了，而且拒不承认那些以他的名义讲话的人，代表们就轻而易举地获得了胜利。)哲学家办事的确是最大公无私的：他们只是将“‘思’、‘在’和‘我’意味着什么”\n\n第三章 思想的形象\n\n229\n\n①【译按】参舍斯托夫，《旷野呼告：克尔凯郭尔与存在哲学》，方珊、李勤译，北京:华夏出版社，1999，页18：“陀思妥耶夫斯基—不比康德和黑格尔差——意识到那些普遍和必然的判断，他的理性向人召唤的强制性真理的意义和使命。但是，与康德和黑格尔相反，他不仅不为这些二二得四’和石墙’而自安自慰，而且相反，正如克尔凯郭尔一样，为理性启示的自明性使陀思妥耶夫斯基极其恐惧不安。是什么把人交给必然性的支配之下？活人的命运怎么会依赖上石墙和二二得四？而石墙和二二得四与人毫不相于，它们与任何人和任何物都毫不相干呢！《纯粹理性批判》没有提出这种问题，也没有听到这样的问题—假如向《纯粹理性批判》询问这些问题的话”。","previous_page":228,"next_page":230}