{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":258,"pdf_page":277,"physical_index":277,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"358c35e8797f986d6c6171e78265104332dd67730ef332e45b62379c6d386bfd"},"chapter":"第三章 思想的形象","content":"[194]不过，这一证明是在与诸公设本身相同的环境中做出的，它确实没有任何效果。至于《泰阿泰德》与《理想国》的文本的调和，这件事情似乎并不像初看上去那样困难。《泰阿泰德》是一篇疑难的(aporétique)对话并非偶然；而阻塞它的那个疑难(aporie)恰恰就是差异(diaphora)的疑难(思想越是要为差异要求一种对于“意见”的超越，意见越是要为自已要求一种差异的内在性)。①《泰阿泰德》是最早的、最重要的通感[常识]理论、认知理论、表象理论，以及作为相关物的错误的理论。但是，差异之疑难却表明这种理论从一开始就失败了，因而必须在一个截然不同的方向上探寻思想学说：是《理想国》第七卷所指出的方向吗？……尽管有这种保留，但《泰阿泰德》的范型继续隐蔽地发挥着作用，而表象的种种持存元素则仍然损害着《理想国》的新观点。\n\n258\n\n差异与重复","previous_page":257,"next_page":259}