{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":281,"pdf_page":300,"physical_index":300,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"476c988ef0637b5bb325a0c37d4776cbcacf85dd5092c15291029fe664065e90"},"chapter":"第三章 思想的形象","content":"第三章 思想的形象\n\n281\n\n① 现代认识论的最为本源的特征之一便是对“问题”的这种双重不可还原性的确认(就此而言，对“成问题的(problématiquc)”这个形容词的名词式使用在我们看来乃是一个不可或缺的新词)。——参布利冈(Georges Bouligand)及其对“问题—元素”和“全局综合—元素”的区分(尤参《数学—逻辑学的绝对的衰落》[Le déclin des absolusmathématico-logiques, éd. d'Enseignement supérieur, 1949];康吉扬(Georges Canguilhem)及其对问题和理论的区分(尤参《正常与病态》[Le normal et le pathologique, Presses Uni-versitaires deFrance，1966][【译按】中译参康吉莱姆，《正常与病态》，李春译，西安：西北大学出版社,2015])。\n\n① Proclus,《欧几里德〈几何原本〉第一卷注》(Les commentaires sur le premier livre des Eléments d’Euclide , trad. Ver Eecke, Desclée de Brouwer) , 页 65 以下。\n\n②【译按】莱布尼茨，《人类理智新论》，前揭，页405。","previous_page":280,"next_page":282}