{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":73,"pdf_page":92,"physical_index":92,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e1ce13e1aafceee333362b068d954b3b608439349ba5516c995537e20232fe1a"},"chapter":"第一章 自在之差异","content":"第一章 自在之差异\n\n73\n\n①【译按】参康德，《纯粹理性批判》，前揭，AIX：“怀疑论者类似于游牧民族，他们憎恶一切地面的牢固建筑，便时时来拆散市民的联盟”(页2)；亦参尼采，《人性的，太人性的：一本献给自由精神的书(下卷)》(李晶浩、高天忻译，上海：华东师范大学出版社,2008)第一篇“杂乱无章的观点和箴言”，第211条：“我们……完全可以严肃地(不带任何高傲或高尚的反抗地)自称‘自由迁徙的精神’，因为我们感到向往自由是我们精神的最强大的驱动力，与受束缚、扎了根的理智相反，我们几乎认为自已的理想就是一种精神的游牧主义”(页515)。\n\n② 参E. Laroche,《古希腊语中的词根“nem”的历史》(Histoire de la racine nem -en grec ancien，Klincksieck，1949)。—拉罗什(E. Laroche)表明vóμoç-véμω[希：礼法的分具]中的分配观念并不是处在一种与分割观念(τéμvω[希：切分]、δaiω[希：划分]、δtarρéω[希:分割])的简单关联中。Nμω[希：分具]的放牧意义只是在很晚的时候才含有了一种土地之分割的意思。围墙与牧场所有地在荷马时代的社会中是没有被想到过的：重要的不是将土地分配给牲畜，而是对牲畜进行分配，将它们分派、分散在树林或山坡之类的无界限空间(espaceillimité)中。Nóμos[希：礼法]首先意指着一种没有明确界限的占有地(例如城邦周围的区域)。“游牧民”的主题亦是由此而来的。\n\n③【译按】索福克勒斯，《俄狄浦斯王》，见《罗念生全集》第二卷，上海：上海人民出版社,2007,页381。","previous_page":72,"next_page":74}