{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","id":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","uuid":"de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title":"差异与重复","normalized_title":"差异与重复","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567591363","isbns":["9787567591363"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":538,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/de9b4263-c277-4979-9f00-91fe8d8660f7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":96,"pdf_page":115,"physical_index":115,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fd12c78ac4f26f053c82c24f39a92c475a090cfd2f54ad9cf7165491e7c1970a"},"chapter":"第一章 自在之差异","content":"就此而言，当莱布尼茨将特异点与一个繁复体的微分元素「差异元素分配在基底中时，当他在世界之创造中发现了一种游戏时，他走得要比黑格尔更远，也就是说，他比黑格尔更深刻：所以，人们才会说第一维度，也就是限制的维度虽然有这样那样的缺点，但却仍然最接近原初深度。莱布尼茨唯一的错误就是73将差异与限制之否定联系在了一起。因为他维持了古老原则的统治，因为他把诸系列同聚合条件联系起来，而没有看到发散本身是肯定的对象，没有看到种种非共可能性同属于一个世界并作为最大的犯罪与最大的美德，被那永恒回归的唯一世界所肯定。\n\n96\n\n差异与重复","previous_page":95,"next_page":97}