{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":143,"pdf_page":163,"physical_index":163,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"11f79b9408dbb36999b2353e8e204093dce1f11e9c535030553df23fe6f1e925"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"索雷尔认为，革命行动需要通过某种对可欲的社会状态的直观性的形象而得到激发。然而这些形象的价值不能加以理性的判断，而仅仅能够情感性地把握：革命神话的价值在于它们的魅力(Anziehungskraft)。为何他们觉得当时的形象好，被吸引的人们并不能说明理由。索雷尔没有在形象和所筹划所向的社会状态之间做出区分，这就意味着，被形象的魅力所吸引的人们也不能给出理由来说明为什么他们觉得筹划所向的那个社会状态是好的。因此这就削弱了他们的归责能力(Zurechnungsfähigkeit)。所谓归责能力指的是：他们带有正当的理由来为他们自己的意见和行为辩护的能力和意愿。正如我在其他地方所说的，理性的归责是伦理自主必不可少的组成部分。①这里的“伦理自主”，指的是人们筹划或追求人生规划的自由。人们能够就这种人生规划说明他们真正的理由。就这一点来讲，索雷尔否定神话的理性特征就会导致削弱伦理自主。人类的伦理自主必须得到重视这一思想为当今的社会批判理论所分享，即便经常是隐含性的。而索雷尔的非理性主义的倾向并不与构成其自身理解的这种规范性设定复合(Komplexder nor-mativenUnterstellungen)相适应。②\n\n朝向社会批判的理性化\n\n143","previous_page":142,"next_page":144}