{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":16,"pdf_page":36,"physical_index":36,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a0373e19d753e1a8edfcd78fffb6d9f945e9faba759e01157077524a2729f3f7"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"艾米尔·安戈恩(Emil Angehrn)提出的问题是，批判诠释学是否以及在何种程度上能被视为超出示范性地位的一种世界和自身解释的普遍结构。诠释学的批判潜能是这一想法最精密的衍生物，即一种文化的、历史的或社会的理解处在与非理解的一种紧张关系中。意义总是伴随着无意义和反意义与我们遭遇，这使得对我们放弃理解的理解得以实现。人的相互理解本质上经历了三个层次，即对理解不可通达的批判、对感知错误的批判、对实在否定性的拒斥。诠释学和批判的交织尤其表现在否定的推动力上，而否定恰恰点燃了理解的希望。\n\n君特·菲加尔(Günter Figal)认为，成功打破诠释学和批判表面的概念对立，既是对怀疑诠释学，也是对伽达默尔诠释学的转化。利科的怀疑诠释学和所有意识形态批判一样是外在批判。但伽达默尔的诠释学也不能提供替代选项，根据这种诠释学，我们的理解排除了相对历史语境的批判性距离。毋宁说，理解的努力包含了批判的导向。根据这样一种融合型的诠释学，批判是理解的内在和必要元素，因为理解只有在和其他解释可能性的比较中得以保留。批判标准就在理解自身中，并且在于，一种解释必须达到相对于其他解释的区分性与简明性。\n\n16\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":15,"next_page":17}