{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":171,"pdf_page":191,"physical_index":191,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3a1f4eb5069e93cc2c7c049c95d99ae202c94334a3c3916ea4e26edd9f7c5d0f"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"这种拒绝反对之前被考察的、在“传统的和批判的理论”中的陈述。根据这种陈述，批判理论能够勾画出一幅理性境况的图像。这里的前后不一致或许在于，霍克海默在1937—1947年改变了他的看法。但是更可能的情况是，上述“拒绝”在形式上是由霍克海默和阿多诺共同授权的，但实际上阿多诺关于事物的特殊洞见再次出现，并且不管是否意识到这一点，当阿多诺与霍克海默的一致性被打破时，阿多诺误入了歧途。①由于我们没有关于这一点的进一步论证，所以只能将这一转变归给霍克海默本人在1937年的论断(批判理论勾画了理性状况的图像)，以及阿多诺本人在1947年对提出标准(Maßstäbe)的拒绝，批判理论缺乏这一要素。由此产生了一个问题：除了如下事实以这种方式能够回避霍克海默在1937年的乐观主义立场所带来的困难以外，阿多诺的拒绝背后有何种根据？\n\n① Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia, Frankfurt/M. 1951, I 18, Zueignung.\n\n批判，以及它如何可能变得更好\n\n171","previous_page":170,"next_page":172}