{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":173,"pdf_page":193,"physical_index":193,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c085bda7ab3d377f0280870c11e2e9ff683e067842743e95ec48099262e7380e"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"无论如何，至此，在如下区分传统的、以特定观点(Gesichtspunkten)为导向的理论及批判，和把社会境况整体纳入视野的批判理论之处，霍克海默和阿多诺达成了一致。他们现在的分歧在于，对阿多诺而非霍克海默或者说而非二十世纪三十年代和四十年代的霍克海默—来说，这样一个特定的视点(Punkt)就是拯救，世界由此被批判理论观视。现在，对阿多诺来说，只有从拯救的角度来看，立足于拯救，才能获得一种洞察世界的真正知识。他使用了这样一幅图像：世界在这种光照下显露了“它的裂口和缝隙”①，就如从飞机上乃至从天空中被观看的阿尔卑斯山一样。阿多诺在1934年写给本雅明的一封信中已经使用过一个类似的图像：卡夫卡好像是“一张从被拯救者视角反映尘世生活的照片，上面出现的只是黑布上的边角”②。如其所述，阿多诺这里回顾的是九年前解读卡夫卡的尝试③，因而这里涉及的是阿多诺长久以来的、对他显而易见的观点。\n\n① Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia, Frankfurt/M. 1951, Aphorismus 29.\n\n② Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, System der Wissenschaft. Erster Teil. Die Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807), hg. von J. Hoffmeister, Hamburg 1952, S. 21.\n\n批判，以及它如何可能变得更好\n\n173","previous_page":172,"next_page":174}