{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":175,"pdf_page":195,"physical_index":195,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b55a1528922d5d6526361ac3e4a6afbe07e806c413adbf6b3ff77c8ae5c83ca1"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"但上述特征刻画还是不完全适用于犹太教。古老的以色列并没有宣称所有有死者的绝望，并且将律法的多样性——正如在《申命记》(Deuteronomium)中所体现的—简化为《出埃及记》20.4中的偶像(形象）禁令(Bilderverbot)也是错误的。无论如何，下面一点对于当前的关联是重要的，即阿多诺不仅在形象方面，而且也在话语方面理解禁令，正如前段引文中最后的概念组——谎言与真理—所示，因此特别是从哲学话语方面进行理解。此外，他实际上认为应屈服于禁令并且顺从禁令。因为前引命题恰恰不是关于犹太文化的某种宗教科学的(Religionswissenschaftlische)介绍，而是阿多诺自己的纲领性表达。因为他认为，不应谈论拯救，并且他也没有说，当下的境况究竟和什么相比才显得是有缺陷的，这也使得他的批判理论成为一种“没有任何起点”①的批判。\n\n① Platon, Staat 532 a.\n\n② Max Horkheimer und Theodor W. Adorno, Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente,in: Theodor W. Adorno, Gesammelte Schriften,Band3, Frankfurt/M. 1986. »Begriff der Aufklärung«, Absatz13.\n\n批判，以及它如何可能变得更好\n\n175","previous_page":174,"next_page":176}