{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":198,"pdf_page":218,"physical_index":218,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a4be44e4bc9f7b3e9c9124398e2e0cd23b3cb4f41466f5b00692b5a1b0a9a073"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"八\n\n提供辩护的挑战—特定形式的社会批评可以利用不同的规范化语言。例如，“伦理”批评或多或少涉及现有社会条件的特性，它以对美好或成功生活的评价性概念来运作，无论这些概念与人们所接受的关于生活方式的概念有多大的差异，如何暴露其病态，最终都必须与受影响者的辩护联系起来。因为在一个辩护的社会领域中，没有地方是外在于这个话语实践之外的；用哈贝马斯的话说，在一个话语澄清的过程中，“只有参与者”①。这并不迫使批判采用单薄的形式概念，尽管它被迫接受关于其有效性的批判。这样，“道德”形式的批评就保留了它的优先权；核心问题是可以以对等的方式要求哪些社会结构。例如，切实地克服“异化”(Entfrem-dung)，是许多伦理批评形式的焦点，涉及通过使其成员响应他们的要求，并服从他们的民主控制“占有”(Aneignung)社会基本结构。②\n\n①对辩护关系的批判的这一维度和下一维度都阻止了公共 辩护的“既存原则”对可以批判的内容施加狭隘限制的做法。这是 对霍耐特的一个反对意见的回应，参见：》Umverteilung als Anerkennung«, in; N. Fraser und ders. , Umverteilung oder Anerkennung?, Frankfurt/M 2003, S, 129-224, hier; S. 152 f.\n\n198\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":197,"next_page":199}