{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":199,"pdf_page":219,"physical_index":219,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fab40f3c576843a6c709c4b6e653d217f7caa76e8e4c3b432127e356e2652564"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"为了有效，每种形式的批评都将“内在”与“超越”的理由结合起来。例如，当平等派(Levellers)在英国内战时期要求政治和宗教自由的“与生俱来的”权利时，他们以此理解他们作为自由英国公民的权利和他们的“自然”权利；此外，当他们将建立资产阶级统治制度的社会契约重新解释为可终止的雇佣契约时，当他们声称财产本身是上帝的意志时，他们将传统的、革命的、资产阶级的和宗教的论点结合起来，并将现有的辩护结构重新塑造成一种新的叙述，他们认为这种叙述足以使推翻一种统治制度合法化。①正如已经提到的，“内在”和“超越”之间的选择在这样的历史条件下是错误的，这两个时刻都必然涉及时代的解放要求。\n\n① Jürgen Habermas, Theorie und Praxis, Frankfurt/M 1971, S. 45.\n\n②以我之见，这里的看法与这篇论文的观点没有根本分歧， 参见：Rahel Jaeggi,»Kein Einzelner vermag etwas dagegen:Adornos Minima Moralia als Kritik von Lebensformen «, in: A. Honneth (Hg. ), Dialektik der Freiheit, Frankfurt/M. 2005, S. 115-141.\n\n批判的基础\n\n199","previous_page":198,"next_page":200}