{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":214,"pdf_page":234,"physical_index":234,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"16e3d81412a75ebe51e0b39e8201f747abbd3f71d34e9b821775c90657bc5d89"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"第二点，承诺在一个很广泛的意义上积极解决“神正论”问题，正如黑格尔在使用该术语时使用的那种意义，即对以下观点的承诺：有可能论证性地指出整个世界是理性的、良好的，并且基本符合人类的利益、需求和愿望，因此我们应该“热烈地拥抱”和肯定这个世界。①\n\n这个框架的第一点处理的是理论性的“意义”，第二点处理的则是相对实践导向的意义概念。最终被默认的是，通过工具性的、可利用的知识表明了一种对自然现象和既有社会结构的意义理解，这种理解证明了人类生活的积极价值。理想型的资产阶级哲学的内部结构可以按照四个步骤被重建出来。\n\n(1)我们所面对的世界确实是有秩序的。\n\n(2)因此我可以(在原则上)理解这个世界(也就是将世界呈现为有意义的)。\n\n(3)将世界以一种恰当的方式呈现为有意义的，这种呈现的形式是对世界拥有系统性的知识，知识①是工具性的、可使用的，并且②可以被“证实”。\n\n① 我已经在以下文章中讨论过这些问题：»Artand theodicy«， in: ders., Morality, Culture, and History, Cambridge 1999, S. 78-115, und »Outside Ethics«, in: ders. , Outside Ethics, Princeton/NJ 2001, S. 40-66.\n\n214\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":213,"next_page":215}