{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":215,"pdf_page":235,"physical_index":235,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4470d2800084f6c50638d6d95465ff79d1936bfdf261beae04862395a6c17e14"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"(4)我应当热烈地拥抱这个世界，并发自内心地肯定它。\n\n其结果是一套有理论根据的、实践的乐观主义。\n\n只是为了重申已经提出的观点，“资产阶级”指的是历史上不断变化的各种具体要素的组合。事实上，你可以看到各种“资产阶级”哲学，它们将上述要素中的一个或另一个作为基础性的或特别重要的要素：\n\n有稳定框架的合理性〔强调(1)(2)(4)的优先性：莱布尼茨]；\n\n清晰性[尤其关注(3)：当代分析哲学]；\n\n确定性〔(3)①的优先性：笛卡儿]；\n\n有用性〔(3)②的优先性：实用主义，功利主义〕;\n\n严重分裂情况下仍然进行激进的肯定〔(2)和(↓):黑格尔〕。\n\n在确定“资产阶级”究竟是什么时，历史背景是如此的重要。这意味着，如果诸元素孤立地或在不同的背景下被考察，它们可能会具有其他的意义。举例说明的话，哲学家对某种清晰性的关注至少可以追溯到古代的智者，因此这种要素本身的存在并不足以使整个哲学立场成为资产阶级的。这也意味着，在一个可能的后资产阶级时代，这些元素中的一些可能会继续存在，尽管是以一种略为变化后的形式存在于不同的语境之中。列如，马克思非常清楚地指出，在今天的社会中，人类力量具有“资产阶级”的形式，但这种形式可以被剥离，从而揭示出潜在的普遍的人类意义，在概念建构的方法和理论建设的形式方面也可能发生类似的事情：\n\n资产阶级哲学和“批判”概念\n\n215","previous_page":214,"next_page":216}