{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":246,"pdf_page":266,"physical_index":266,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7ad298ec1b21af6b5d2af368a9b72793a6b03b30eb613ba3753482c9ffc53537"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"而对社会生活的异化(Entfremdung)和形变(Deformation)的原因作出研究。①\n\n(3)批判的目标是对错误和坏事物的修正(Korrek-tur)。批判者不会仅仅进行解释，而是要进行改变。②错误和坏事物不应当仅仅被诊断和分析，而是应当通过批判被克服。通过修正的精神(Ethos)，如下问题成为中心：批判如何实际上达及它的接受者批判成为实践的问题。批判的可理解性是通过其内在的程序而被实现的，特别是通过能使其批判得到辩护的表面(scheinhaften)知识。尤其是持有无根据的正义观念的人必须能够评判，是否他的正义理解要被再三考察并且最终被修正，以及如果是的话，为什么需要如此。克尔凯郭尔他将其工作理解为一种对时代的修正愿意去知道，因而在一种以占有[真理(Aneignung)]为目标的“间接沟通”(indirektenMitteilung)的形式下实行批判。③对于马克思和霍克海默而言，(以一种并非毫无问题的方式)批判性的科学应当在科学家和无产者的相互影响下，引发一种对被扭曲的意识进行修正的动力。①借助修正的含义，对于社会理论，如此无可置疑的思想家，如施莱尔马赫，也和批判概念结合在了一起：在文本批判中不仅仅要对残缺文本(Korruptelen)、印刷和书写错误的解释与评判进行理解，而且，文本批判也是对其的订正(Revision)。②\n\n① Max Horkheimer, »Traditionelle und kritische Theorie«, in: ders., Gesammelte Schriften, Band 4, Frankfurt/M. 1988, S. 162-225.\n\n②基于马克思《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》第11条的精神，霍克海 默使得批判理论和传统理论的特征间的对立变得尖锐化了，参见： Max Horkheimer, »Traditionelle und kritische Theorie« , in: ders. , Kritische Theorie , hg. Von ASchmidt, Frankfurt/M. 1977, S. 192.\n\n③ 参见：Tilo Wesche,Kierkegaard. Eine philosophische Einführung,Stuttgart 2003,S. 165ff.\n\n246\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":245,"next_page":247}