{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":25,"pdf_page":45,"physical_index":45,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fa92a0c962f93eb41cceb1aee024cfb1e36527c207a227fd9e78b65108eb8672"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"显而易见的是，社会学经典的研究方案从一开始就不仅仅指向社会批评，但我们必须看到，它们始终包含着批判性的维度，恰恰是对生活状态的变化所抱有的忧虑催生了这些方案。这些经典之所以具有取之不尽的现实意义，可能也有赖于此。每一代社会学家似乎总是一再回到这些经典，将它们视为自己工作的灵感和动力源泉。而后来产生的很多社会学成果则总是很快被人们所遗忘。①实际上我们必须注意到，当社会学的诊断(无论是暗示性地还是明确地)处理生活的成败问题时，它往往会赢得比学术范围更广的影响力和感召力：无论是阿多诺追寻的“在错误之中正确地生活”，马尔库塞对晚期资本主义生活的单向度感到无力的愤怒，还是舒尔茨对“体验社会”的研究以及霍耐特所讨论的“为承认而斗争”，其中都清楚地表明了这一“终极背景”，而且通常是在作品标题中就已经表明了。批判理论之所以对社会学的新生力量持续保有吸引力，原因显然在于：就像它的计划和名称所标明的那样，它承诺为社会学的根本冲动保留地位。而与此同时，其他竞争中的学派试图拒绝社会学的原初动力和合法支柱，因为它似乎与他们所要求的“科学性”和“中立性”在价值取向上相冲突。\n\n① Heinz-Jürgen Dahme und Otthein Rammstedt,  Die zeitlose Modernität der soziologischen Klassiker, Überlegungen zur Theoriekonstruktion von Émile Durkheim, Ferdinand Tönnies, Max Weber und besonders Georg Simmel «, in; dies. (Hg.), Georg Simmel und die Moderne, Frankfurt/M, 1984,S. 449-478,\n\n时间关系批判\n\n25","previous_page":24,"next_page":26}