{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":264,"pdf_page":284,"physical_index":284,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a46720987141878c70f11e5d30f8bdaf23fa236e3b7ec8c447313d9f115e2866"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"对于简单化的批判力量大体上把自身规定为一种对话现象，其自身目的(Selbstzweck)在于产生一种意义盈余。这种意义盈余首先创造出一种批判的可通达性，并且使得进行简单化者的论证能够被理解。当某些东西能冲击人们长期以来的一般信念时，一场争论何为更好论证的对话就将被触发。盈余的意义与对论证的自身开放态度有关，它先于陈述和交流沟通。这种意义由自身目的的形式产生，在论证中被展现、代表、替换。在这样的对话中，没有什么不依赖于其交流方式(它被言说的方式)，而能说出的东西在此被交流。论证被说出，既没有伴随着要确定某种洞见的目标，也没有要相信其他洞见的意图。这样的对话并没有旨在从言说者或解释者那里获得知识成果。这种自相矛盾可以从结构上得到描述：一个被说出的论证与交换的和被计算利益的目标都无关，这种目标恰恰能够存在于一种证明或修正中。说出一个论证，其自身目的现在首先释放出了一种让-自身-被涉及(das Sich-ansprechenLassen)。对话的意义盈余担保了为论证而开放的现象，不是因为它施加了一种辩护压力，并且迫使人持有信念，而是因为它值得被说出。说出某些东西因为它值得被说出，是一种对自身权利的合乎自身目的的展示，它既不会在一种理解导向的(verständnisorientierten)言语行为中(如提示、通知)，也不会在一种赞同导向的(einverständnisorientierten)(规范性的、授权性的意愿表达，如允诺、宣告、命令等）、后果导向的或者表达性的言语行为中被消解。①\n\n264\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":263,"next_page":265}