{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":308,"pdf_page":328,"physical_index":328,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7ff496df26a46cfe4f40289ca3dc4f192db61d7a08769583e59a91557100b268"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"要兑现这一论断，首先就需要对以下问题进行阐明和准确的描述：这些文本被其作者称为“谱系学”的文本要“做”什么。这要求对于尼采的和福柯的文本进行一种准确的和系统的阅读，同时对于这些能够对谱系学文本有构成性作用的动机进行规定。随后是从普遍意义上追问谱系学批判的可能性，以及其方法论的、体系性的和形式的意蕴，即追问作为批判的谱系学的效果。所提出的问题是：凭借何种方式，依据何种权利，谱系学的文本能够做出如下事情它明显做出的事情即通过历史化(Historisierung)和情境化(Kontextualisierung)撼动某些事物的有效性。在历史化和批判之间的关联不是直接的，因为来源和价值、发生和有效性在逻辑上是不相互依赖的，并且从纯粹的事实变化来推断其有价值或无价值，是得出了一种“发生学的错误结论”。\n\n①关于批判的各种形式的讨论，参见：Michael Walzer， Kritik und Gemeinsinn, Berlin 1990, bes. S. 11-79, und MattiasIser, Empörung undFortschritt. Zur Idee einer rekonstruktiven Gesellscha ftskritik, Frankfurt/M., New York 2008, Kap. 1. 关 于谱系学批判特殊性的追问，参见：RudiVisker，Michel Foucault. Genealogie als Kritik, München 1991, Axel Honneth, »Rekonstruktive Gesellschaftskritik unter genealogischem Vorbehalt, Zur Idee der  Kritik、 in der Frankfurter Schule«, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 48: 5, 2002, S.729-737, und MartinSaar, Genealogie als Kritik. Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault, Frankfurt/M. , New York 2007, besondersS. 293-346,\n\n308\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":307,"next_page":309}