{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":31,"pdf_page":51,"physical_index":51,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"020416f70f5347776fcdf38a2d5fdf249aebb766c28ecb7110afa985b1bc8b7b"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"3. 异化和对世界关系的批评\n\n接下来要指出的是，加速和异化是对当代进行诊断性社会批评的关键范畴。简单来说，这个论证要说的是，现代化进程具有一种将自身孤立起来的加速力量，这种力量不断加剧，将现代性的基本承诺埋葬。这种力量按照自身的尺度来规定生活，脱离了自然的约束、物质性的短缺、习俗与传统，也超然于经济层面的生存斗争。现代的规范性计划与现代化的后现代阶段之间发生了失衡，这导致了不断加剧的异化经验。无论是个体层面还是集体层面，行动者都体验到，他们既不能主动塑造也不能被动吸纳自己的生活和社会状况，他们对自己造就的上升压力感到无能为力。与此同时，他们感到很多东西都变得陌生了，他们待着的地方、他们交往的人、他们手边的事物、他们使用的工具，乃至他们自己的需求、感情和服务于人格同一性的个人历史。在我描述的纯粹“内在的”社会批评中，加速和异化构成了范畴的基础。\n\n①自主性思想是现代性的规范、文化核心，约翰·阿纳松 (Johann Arnason)紧接着卡斯托里亚迪斯(Castoriades)提出了这 — 观 点:» Autonomy and Axiality «, in: ders. und P. Murphy (Hg. ), Agon, Logos, Polis: The Greek Achievement and its Aftermath, Stuttgart 2001, S. 155-206; vgl. ferner auch Peter Wag ner, Soziologie der Moderne. Freiheit und Disziplin, Frankfurt/ M. , New York 1995.\n\n时间关系批判\n\n31","previous_page":30,"next_page":32}