{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":315,"pdf_page":335,"physical_index":335,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"727762cc960fdc1eb8f94d72c3351ce2089f1db054810716a61ecb822d8fa90f"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"敞开。①\n\n当人们调转视角，并且形成了对如此被建构的谱系学叙述(指向在其中被主题化并且与其关联的主体)的要求时，在其中被包含的谱系学测试或者律令才能作为一种对自我审视(Selbstüberprüfung)的呼唤而得到表达。因此，谱系学的文本是面向其读者的，并且包含了一个很难被接受的消息：“你要掌握一个关于你自身的真理，即你仅仅是在所指明的权力作用的基础上而成为你所是的，你应当追问，是否你必须要承担它或者另一个他者。”因此，在自我理解(Selbstverständnis)的过程中，谱系学的批判目标是一种在技艺层面(künstlich)引发的危机，使自我理解面临着一种来自外部的、难以被接受的解释。①在最好的情况下，这种解释能够激发什么，是对于自我理解和自我关系的一种检验—在它们与本己的“自我”(eigenenSelbst)和权力作用历史相交织的知识之一致性的层面。\n\n①对于这种尝试性解读模式(Formeln)的进一步阐发，参 见： Martin Saar, Genealogie als Kritik. Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault, Frankfurt/M., New York2007，S.127-130.一种对于尼采文本和思想游戏的律令特 征(Imperativcharakters)—当然是在同“永恒复归”(Wiederkehr) 的惯用概念相关联的意义上—的类似强调，主要体现于： Bernd Magnus, Nietzsche'sExistential Imperative,Bloomington 1978, und Alexander Nehamas, Nietzsche: Life as Literature, Cambridge1985.关于谱系学“测试”(Tests)的反身性样式的最清 晰表达，参见：Raymond Geuss，»Nietzsche and Genealogya，in: ders. , Morality, Culture, and History: Essays on German Philosophy , Cambridge 1999, S.1-28, und von Bernard Williams, Truth andTruth fulness : An Essay in Genealogy, Princeton 2002.\n\n谱系学的批判\n\n315","previous_page":314,"next_page":316}