{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":316,"pdf_page":336,"physical_index":336,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bdcb1736a74ab9c25c721532fc010c475a78aa642f7684ff62b003ad8305301d"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"对于谱系学及其律令特征之方向性的阐释，表明了尼采的谱系学叙事在本质上与接受者的关联性(diewes-entlicheAdressatenrelativität)。它是面向主体写作的，这些主体在其中应当作为被叙述的对象而得到再认识。它们，并且只有它们(且不存在外部标准)规定了何种谱系学的假设会引起矛盾或者契合(Zugeständnis)，以及何种假设会促使它修正其自我图像。作为“律令”或者“呼吁”(Appellative)，谱系学的文本与道德的或者智慧的规则(Klugheitsregeln)相比，在一种较弱的意义上发挥作用：它们所要求的所有东西，就是它们得到关注，并且作为一种自我反思的动因得到理解。它们所要求或者命令的，是一种争论，而不是对于规则的遵守。谱系学的文本向其读者发出的召唤，在生存论或伦理学方面既是紧迫的，又是未得到充分规定的。它揭示了，它恰好能够触发(mo-tivieren)何种行动或者态度变化。在动摇了一种被规定的道德意识之后，有一种对于“转变”(Transformation)的一般性呼唤，而非对一种新形式的伦理转向的具体建议。\n\n① 雷蒙·盖斯(Raymond Geuss)在一种类比的关联——通过对意识形态批判程序的阐释—中谈到，是否根据问题化，特定信念“在反思中是不可接受的”。(The Idea of a Critical Theo-ry, Cambridge 1981, S. 62.)\n\n316\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":315,"next_page":317}