{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":328,"pdf_page":348,"physical_index":348,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"29cdf7710694ba66d37cfa3b387ae5740159ca64dd77639c6e8aed19dcbd9ae3"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"第一，谱系学批判的历史学特征使其严格地同当前批判(Gegenwartskritik)的展示性(präsentistischen)和遗忘历史的形式相区别，这种当前批判使得政治和社会斗争的历史性深度渐渐消失。后者总是力求在当前问题以及当前政治和社会身份的来源和语境上构造假设，努力赋予社会批判的目光一种景深，它能够彻底拓展现实之物和可能之物的理解领域。因为它的方法论出发点是对价值、实践和制度的彻底历史化，这扩展了其背后可追问的和成问题内容的领域，因此也使得投向早已熟悉之物的另一种目光成为可能。历史不仅仅是自我证实的来源，而且也能成为自我陌生化和距离化的来源，印证着令人惊讶的、揭露真实的证据，后者是通过以谱系学的方式被制造的、历史传记性的配置(Konstellationen)产生的。正是在这种光照下，知识形式、生命形式与权力实践、支配实践的纠缠才第一次被展示出来。①\n\n① 关于谱系学的历史思想，参见：Ulrich Brieler，Die Unerbittlichkeitder Historizität. Foucault als Historiker, Köln 1998, und Mathieu Potte-Bonneville, Michel Foucault , l’inquiétude de l’histoire, Paris2004.\n\n328\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":327,"next_page":329}