{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":348,"pdf_page":368,"physical_index":368,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"286a69d39d59294b43b7d243cf6d84be6163c59c6d6a936eb3d0b3de0ec61a74"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"但是意识形态批判如何指导我们的行动呢？换言之，它如何回答这个实践的问题：我或我们应该做什么？\n\n(二)第二个悖论：“一个具有规范意义的\n\n非规范性批判”\n\n这样，我们来到前文提到的第二个悖论：主张意识形态批判是“一个具有规范意义的非规范性批判”。安东·莱斯特(AntonLeist)批评该论断为“意识形态批判的神话”，因此这是一种虚假的自我理解，尽管是诱人的。\n\n1. 意识形态批判的规范的-非规范性地位\n\n现在，意识形态批判实际上在多大程度上是“一个具有规范意义的非规范性批判”，即是批判性的？或者更确切地说，它在多大程度上声称自己是如此？\n\n至少，该主张的第二个部分①似乎容易得到证实。意识形态批判不是规范性的，因为它没有对某物应当如何发表看法(如某种社会制度如何设置才是好的或者正义的，或者如何设置是坏的或不正义的)，而只是分析它所遇到的社会制度和实践具有什么属性。只要进行意识形态批判，首先都要收集证据(Indizien)。它阐明联系，指出内在矛盾，揭露那些有助于掩盖矛盾的机制，分析统治利益（Herrschaftsinteressen)或者统治机能。这里表明，一个状况不同于它所声称的：某些特定规范的功能与人们最初认为的不同，或者说它们的起源和效果与人们所想象的不同。\n\n①即“非规范性”。—译者注\n\n348\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":347,"next_page":349}