{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":398,"pdf_page":418,"physical_index":418,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"211169c7c66f9270d88bad1b9ea7080447522b95f825f8222d257098b6f02655"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"解释学与批判\n\n艾米尔·安戈恩(Emil Angehrn)\n\n阿思汗译\n\n一、反题和补充\n\n解释学和批判，这一对概念在传统中代表诸多互补学科共同构成的整体，也是弗里德里希·施莱尔马赫著名讲座的标题①，但在今天，它们的含义却彼此相反。①在最新的讨论中，占上风的观点是，批判反对解释学。在海德格尔和伽达默尔的著作中，解释学思想以对于先人之见的再度正名，以及对于传统和历史的亲和性为标志；哈贝马斯则用更清晰的方式刻画了批判-解放思想针对来自风俗和既成关系的拘束的攻击。关于主要的对立，即“解释学和意识形态批判”，已经有就批判性思考的基础和解释学的对比展开的辩论。②在后来的论争中，如在后现代的思潮和解构主义中，解释学从不同角度被视为一种传统，一种肯定性的思考形式，它进行着一种观念化的工作，并不能感知到文本中的断裂，也不能停止错误的片面化行为。按照这种观点，解释学和形而上学串通一气，缺少批判的潜力，它是未经批判的。为了达到理解传统、阐释自身、对现实进行全面的阐释的后形而上学思想，我们需要这种批判。\n\n① Friedrich Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik und Kritik mit besonderer Beziehung auf das Neue Testament, aus Schleiermachers handschriftlichem Nachlasse und nachgeschriebenen Vorlesungen herausgegeben von Friedrich Lücke, Berlin 1838, neu hg. von M.Frank, Frankfurt/M. 1977.\n\n398\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":397,"next_page":399}