{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":403,"pdf_page":423,"physical_index":423,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6a9ea4fd2f9146f47e0b87313fafd9f54a8a14fce6188af1911f21ea502f135d"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"二、理解的边界：不理解、误解\n\n在标准情况下，解释学的出发点在于：意义并非是自明的。解释学面对意义复杂的对象，我们并不能直截了当地理解它们，相反它们的含义是关联复杂的：它们关联到晦涩的文本、陌生的生活方式，这些都需要转写和解读。理解并不是总在进行的过程，而意义也不是已经被给予的东西。卢曼的系统理论认为，意义呈现了一种“不可否认的媒介”①。因此，关于意义问题的紧张，以及所有对于意义缺乏的抱怨，都可以归结为范畴错误。与此不同，对于解释学来说，意义是另一种现象：\n\n① Niklas Luhmann, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M. 1998,S. 52.\n\n解释学与批判\n\n403","previous_page":402,"next_page":404}