{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":406,"pdf_page":426,"physical_index":426,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4e62601cf77cd7682a5936f95356a038c4ce1622b89658a17db595d5cf12f1ed"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"解释学，就其基本特征来说，是对理解之边界的深入探讨。它立足于对朴素理解的怀疑与针对关于意义本身素朴性的信念的怀疑。它强调意义本身的开放性，但也认为，我们一定要考察意义图像借以向我们显现的形式，并且通过将它与显白的表达或者既成的解读方法进行对比，来阐释它的意义。理解的批判性自身反思可以呈现为不同的形态。这里我们要提及的是三种处理具有代表性的传达意义的理解方式，它们构成了解构过程，同时也界定了一种综合的解释学：首先，它是作为对于固定意义形式的批判性消解的解构；其次，它也是作为诠释与意义生成的建构；最后，它是作为对于客观表达或者主观意味的意义的接受尝试。\n\n在这些行动的联系中，理解是人类交流之有限性的来源。这意味着这样的事实：没有意义是通过纯粹的理念性被给予的，没有语言能毫无遗漏地表达意谓，没有解读能穷尽文本。同样，批判性的自我反思也涉及理解的立场。它反思理解经由传统和历史关联受到的限制，这两者虽然构成了所有理解的根本前提，但并非是无可置疑的前提，相反，我们应当批判地考察它们。反思性的理解将自己从既定的范畴框架和沉淀存留的意义中解放出来。理性批判用抽象的方式进行对能力的分析与判断，而解释学则考察理解行动处在具体情境中与自己和世界的关系。如果不考虑理解的条件以及对象的陌生性，那么理解的真实性就无从保证了。只有理解行动关注自身的有限性，它才有可能成功。\n\n406\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":405,"next_page":407}