{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":428,"pdf_page":448,"physical_index":448,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"91d58bc4d2156776ba99cc0a25dc54a8ea18e8ff5d6af6ada25237f7f804ce2c"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"当双方相互和睦地争执时，对于如何解决伽达默尔和哈贝马斯间的冲突，已经存在一个提议；若这个提议在其中被考虑到，并被作为交流的基础，或许这场争论会以另外的方式进行。①保罗·利科将这个提议以“解释的冲突”②为题进行了表述，将其拟定为对一种批判性理解与一种思索性(sich besinnenden)、交谈性理解之间的互补性的辩护。③然而，利科的提议之所以值得注意，并非由于其终结了这一争论。相反，他完全以前后矛盾为代价，使得这一争论保持开放；从他的思考中产生了这一论辩结构性延续的观点。利科对两种相互冲突解释的阐述引发了对其解决提议可靠性的质疑，特别是由于他对一种特殊批判性理解的阐述很明显出现在其有问题的方面。因此，他的解决提议仍需要检验：一种与一般性理解彻底区分的批判性理解，如哈贝马斯所设想的那样，到底是否可能。如若答案应当是否定的—也将会是否定的—也不需要放弃这样一种批判性理解的构想。但考虑到理解与批判的关系问题，这将不会导向疑难。毋宁说，这个问题被重新提出了，并且以其当前可以被肯定回答的方式被提出了。为了解决利科带出的难题，在对理解的澄清中，在由理解概念出发对批判的规定中，将会得出答案。\n\n① Hans-Georg Gadamer, » Klassische und philosophische Hermeneutik (1968)«, in: ders., Gesammelte Werke, Band 2, Tübingen 1993,S.92-117, hier:S. 114.\n\n② Paul Ricoeur, De l'interprétation. Essai sur Freud, Paris 1965, Kapitel II: »Le conflitdes interprétations«, S. 30-46.\n\n③ Paul Ricoeur,De l'interprétation. Essai surFreud,Paris 1965, Kapitel IL.2: »L'interprétation comme récollection du sens«, S.36-40.对这一建议的讨论参见：Emil Angehrn，Interpretation und Dekonstruktion. Untersuchungen zur Hermeneutik, Weilerswist2004.\n\n428\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":427,"next_page":429}