{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":430,"pdf_page":450,"physical_index":450,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7d43f2f625636bfcae0b81b106b49c6c9c6edc2c3979bc6bca32339fc993003f"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"如若不可能至少从根本上追踪意识产生的过程以及其中发生的推延，上述设想就将是荒谬的。被意识之物必须至少根本上作为生命发生的效应被弄清楚。根据利科的阐述，在怀疑的解释学中，这应该通过一种间接处理的意义科学(Wissenschaft des Sinns)来进行，这种科学本质上是间接的，也就是说，不可还原为直接的或即时的意义意识。②只有当这种科学相较于此意识是另一种形式的知识时，它才能证明自己是这种知识的真理。\n\n这种间接科学的运用就是怀疑练习。这意味着，它使某一意识内容带上了非真实性的标志。那些始终被意识到的东西并非自身存在的东西，而且是其生成性无法追及的生成物。在其从根本上被设定的直接性中，意识不能把握到自身的，以及在自身中被给予物的生成性。正如怀疑的解释学所预设的，意识没有经验的可能性。它是某个他者的影响，因而是其直接性中的假象(Schein)。①\n\n①“意义的阐释”(exégèse du sens)(Paul Ricoeur，De l'interprétation. Essai sur Freud, Paris 1965, Kapitel II.3: » L'interprétation comme exercice du soupçon«, S. 44.)\n\n②“一种间接的意义科学，不可还原为直接的意义意识” (une scíence médiate du sens, irréductible à la conscience immédiate du sens)。(Paul Ricoeur, De l'interprétation. Essai sur Freud, Paris 1965, Kapitel IL 3: »L'interprétation comme exercice du soupçon«,S. 44.)\n\n430\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":429,"next_page":431}