{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":434,"pdf_page":454,"physical_index":454,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5335199963cd67463bfa6827fdde4e3d57dec4bf8f9bd21b127599c381beffae"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"然而、理解不是单纯的能力；它不同于一种作为倾向被获取，并在适当时机被实现的“能力之知”。①对理解而言，关键其实在于，某物被理解；某物自行展开，从而为某人自身提供了一种之前尚未存在的行为可能性。或多或少明显的是，这规定了某种行为，这种行为被普遍地看作解释学行为；就理解而言，相对于行为的正当，它较少依赖于行为本身。理解意味着：能够从某物开始某物，并且，人们以某物为准进行设定，使其在解释学行为中如其所是地发挥积极作用。正因如此，人们在一个充分理解的答案中评估对话伙伴的表达，也正因如此，游戏较少关乎本己行为，而更关乎本己行为所属的游戏的现实性。②\n\n相对于理解者作为实事在场的东西越集中，理解的事实束缚和事实性也就越明显。文本建构就是最集中的情况，就其本质而言，它是需要解释的。在这里，在本己解释行为之下的意图是，使文本，也就是说，使一部作品内在的意义组织(Bedeutungsgewebe)发挥积极作用。若其成功，并且文本在行为中得以呈现，那么文本就被理解了。也就是说，理解是从本己行为的适当性出发，对伴随行为所呈现的实事进行的成功设定。\n\n① 参见吉尔伯特·赖尔对于“能力之知”(knowing how)和 “命题之知”(knowing that)的区分。(Gilbert Ryle，The Concept of Mind, London 1949, besonders Kapitel 3, S. 62-82.)\n\n② Hans-Georg Gadamer, »Spiel als Leitfaden der ontologischen Explikation «, in: ders., Gesammelte Werke, Band 1, Tübingen 1986,S. 107-139.\n\n434\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":433,"next_page":435}