{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":438,"pdf_page":458,"physical_index":458,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3089d3da6f32750e3a44f5d2ed8544bc88f55c44d37ca1fbe3abba109a024c0b"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"因此，怀疑的解释学仅仅表面上是批判性的。它还缺少兑现批判的可能性，因为它仍保持与理解的相对外在的对立。但批判只能在理解自身中兑现。某人是真正地，抑或只是虚假地理解，这取决于理解是否是可证明的。对游戏规则理解的宣称通过正确玩游戏得以被确认，并通过不合适的行为得以被否定。同样，对文本的理解而言，所宣称的解释成功也必须能够被证明和展示。\n\n由于理解就是这样一种成功，批判的可能性就在于理解自身。解释学把握的批判不关乎理解本身，而关乎在理解中能够实现的，并且被正确理解后也确实实现了的东西。理解一开始就涉及在实现与不实现间的抉择。它本质上属于这样一种解释学经验，其使得无论自身行为还是要理解之物都服从于可实现性的视角。任凭谁想要努力理解，都以不同程度投入了理解的可能性，从而使要理解之物发挥积极作用。本己的可能性只在此观点下被考虑；只要其仍关乎实事，而非关乎以特定视角呈现自身并作为人自身采取某种立场，那么可能性是否是本己的就无关紧要了。对这些立场的肯定，如断言某一断言，在理解意愿和理解中就是不重要的；如现象学转向所言，这是“加括号”，是设定悬置。由于本己的可能性作为本己的被“加括号”，这些可能性就不能不受限制地从实事的视角出发起作用。这关乎实事，而非关乎人们自己相较其他东西当作信念使之起作用和主张的东西。\n\n438\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":437,"next_page":439}