{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":452,"pdf_page":472,"physical_index":472,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"093aac5e9b19c71b8f4de60a34019063386e72fbf6f55f37df830dd24cde5f4e"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"在科学进步的第一阶段，柏拉图式的数学式的确定性概念仍然会被运用到实验科学之中；科学不仅仅必须追求进步，同时也必须能够满足可以用数学语言表达的要求，这样，科学的洞见才能从数学中获得确定性。在这个意义上，开普勒可以称得上是狂热的柏拉图主义者，他相信，上帝创世是为了从事几何学。①然而，因为从二十世纪以来，科学的进步只能通过将旧理论批判为错误实现，实验科学和数学科学就进入了一个不可消解的困境之中：即使对现代科学来说，数学的确定性也同样意味着永恒的有效性，因为今天人们仍然保有柏拉图式的和毕达哥拉斯式的理想。杜威提示我们，柏拉图时代有着这样的信念，“我们只有在固定不变的东西中才能找到确定性”②。现代科学的进步仅仅在没有科学洞见是确信无疑之时，才是可能的，因为任何理论都可能被批判为错误的。\n\n① Johannes Keppler, Mysterium cosmographicum/Das Weltgeheimnis (1597), hg. und übers. von M. Caspar, Berlin 1936.\n\n② John Dewey, The Quest for Certainty. The Later Works 1925-1953, Volume 4: 1929, hg. von A. Boydston, Carbondale, Edwardsville1988.\n\n452\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":451,"next_page":453}