{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":73,"pdf_page":93,"physical_index":93,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ccacee484122aee25e01dbd55b68d036b7f9618946bf2850e3c510da88ed7c30"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"如前所述，哈贝马斯并没有完全放弃对意识形态的批判。这种批判的主导者是在《交往行为理论》中的“病理学”、(生活世界的)“殖民化”甚至“意识形态”等概念。通过这些概念，哈贝马斯充分了解意识形态批判的专制家长制的问题，他将自己置于这一传统之中。因此，在《交往行为理论》中，一方面，哈贝马斯关注证明，语言的存在(无论它们被破坏的程度如何)原则上都能充分地批判自己和对方，而且他们做这件事不需要科学的、哲学的或其他领域的专家。①在每一个语言表达中都有一个与可能的批判有关的行动，与之相伴的是这样一个要求，即要求人们可以抵御批判。另一方面，哈贝马斯考虑到来自外部的意识形态批判的干预，在那里他合理地要求将其以社会科学的方式对象化。最糟糕的莫过于文化批评家的号叫，如阅读的消失或互联网对儿童的危险，他们基本上只想用这种方式使自己的文化实践成为普遍的戒律。\n\n①在这一点上，哈贝马斯遭遇了文化的和后殖民的研究的代表们，后者不仅指责批判理论否定了被批判者的任何行动的可能性(Gayatri ChakravortySpivak,»Can theSubaltern Speak?«,in:C. Nelson und L. Grossberg [Hg. ], Marxism and the Interpreta-tion ofCulture，Basingstroke 1988，S. 271-313)，而且也会遭遇批判社会学(参见注释[24])以及朗西埃的歧义理论(JacquesRancière, Das Unvernehmen. Politik undPhilosophie, Frankfurt/M.2002)。\n\n(意识形态)批判如何被规训\n\n73","previous_page":72,"next_page":74}