{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":76,"pdf_page":96,"physical_index":96,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"538fe0ad9a87d5fbc9428951882a9cfa507710259442abf314812094ce69766b"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"五、在意识形态方面的工作\n\n最近的两个例子\n\n为了对意识形态的批判作辩护②，并且为了说明，上述意义上的意识形态批判的“构造”可能是什么样子的，我将提到皮埃尔·布迪厄的社会学，它似乎与哈贝马斯的社会学截然相反，最后也会提到意识形态批判的电影形式。通过提及这样两种不同形式的意识形态批判，我们应该也会清楚地看到，这里不可能只有一条道路，因此也不可能有“主星座”，这也为哲学打开了一个新的视角。\n\n①关于个体的具有批判能力的行动者名义下的意识形态批 判的批判，参见：Luc Boltanski und Laurent Thévenot，»TheSociology of Critical Capacity«, in: European JournalofSocial Theory 2, 1999, S. 359-377; dies., Über die Rechtfertigung. Eine Soziologie der kritischenUrteilskraft, Hamburg2007;Robin Celikates, » From Critical Social Theory to a Social Theory of Critique. On the Critique of Ideology after the Pragmatic Turn«, in: Constellations 13, 2006,S.21-40.\n\n②依据其声称的目标为意识形态批判辩护，参见：James Bohman, »When Water Chokes: Ideology, Communication, and Practical Rationality «, in: Constellations 7, 2000, S.382-392; Maeve Cooke, »Resurrecting the Rationality of Ideology Critique: Reflections on Laclau on Ideology«, in: Constellations 13, 2006, S. 4-20; Michael Freeden, Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach, Oxford 1996; Aletta J.Norval, » The Things We Do with Words-Contemporary Approaches to the Analysis of Ideology«, in; British Journal of Political Science 30, 2000,S.313-346.\n\n76\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":75,"next_page":77}