{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":82,"pdf_page":102,"physical_index":102,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f5d5a0d5b29898febaed61ae7fcc5af06bfa8d2a011cc66b13b47a6df66fa428"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"在我看来，布迪厄已经进入了参与性的意识形态批判性的分析实践的领域，尤其是在《世界的苦难》里。布迪厄与众多合作者一起进行了这项关于日常苦难和小困难的研究，除了关于美国的一篇短文之外，它还专门讨论了法国中下层社会的社会状况。它不仅仅围绕受访者生活中“缺少什么”的问题出版了大量的采访材料②(就像布迪厄早期研究所做的那样)，并可以获得出版。由于以不寻常的规模在显要位置发表，特别是由于其没有结论的连续编排(这使我想到了意识形态批判结构的审美修辞维度)，这份采访材料具有意识形态批判的附加价值。它使日常的痛苦可以被社会和政治批判所触及，这痛苦通常被相关的人和公共话语淡化为“普遍的苦难”。\n\n对受访者来说，访谈的关键附加价值在于对话给了他们非同寻常的关注，以这样一种方式在那里绝不是不存在的希望、欲望和替代方案被揭示出来，也就是在受访者自己也倾向于只看到更多不可改变的、可忽略的小苦难的地方，这些苦难通常只有当它们呈现出可观的规模时才会被发现。在许多情况下，采访显然对被采访者来说具有自我解释和自我陈述的特点。特别是当对话变得对称，受访者采用(学会采用)与问题有距离的社会学眼光时，这不乏会导致对所经历的问题进行新的评估，认为这些问题不是那么独特。\n\n① 这也是大卫·斯特雷克(DavidStreckers)对布迪厄的批 评，他顺便也把布迪厄定位为对哈贝马斯的意识形态批评的修 正。(Logik der Macht. Zum Ort der Kritik zwischen Theorie und Praxis, Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin 2006, S. 125 ff. )\n\n② Pierre Bourdieu u. a. , Das Elend der Welt. Zeugnisse und Diagnosen alliāglichen Leidens an der Gesellschaft, Konstanz1997(frz.1993), S.788.\n\n82\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":81,"next_page":83}