{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","id":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","uuid":"dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title":"什么是批判","normalized_title":"什么是批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303287741","isbns":["9787303287741","0120214113"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":490,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%98%AF%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/dfe67541-4039-4f88-87ce-dbbadb056cb2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":84,"pdf_page":104,"physical_index":104,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0cb0b69b5c83f87672294c45c97410d123dfc7690530a06253a63b801daa292e"},"chapter":"什么是批判","content":"我并不想以此美化布迪厄及其合作者的采访项目的问题。人们可以合理地从同情的立场出发对《世界的苦难》进行批评。人们的指责尤其涉及被采访者的选择(往往是采访者的熟人)和关于被采访者的社会背景的信息的缺乏，这有时会导致对个人的奇怪的倾听。①尽管有各种批评，但对这个访谈汇编来说重要的和支持它的，也使它对意识形态批判的问题具有重要意义的是：简单地相信社会结构上的弱势群体可以自己批判他们的情况，只要他们愿意，这是一种可疑的态度，就像给他们开处方或量化他们的不适(Unbehagen)一样。与所有这些(理论上的)行为模式相比，《世界的苦难》引起了人们对社会中那些被边缘化的群体的关注，他们的苦难太不引人注目，无法被相关者自身或公共话语所接受。这是一种停留在个人不适领域的痛苦，没有构造和公开，而且—布迪厄的访谈集也充分说明了这一点—经常以一种类似于桌上空谈的方式和相关的陈词滥调来阐述。因此，布迪厄和他的合作者所追求的意识形态批判主要是使广泛的、日常的不适感作为集体的、可由受害者自己倾诉的问题而显现出来，从而可以被批判。\n\n①参见安吉拉·默克罗比(Angela McRobbie)的建设性批 评——《不幸的混合？布迪厄的〈世界的苦难〉》(A Mixed Bag of Misfortune? Bourdieu's Weight of the World)(The Uses of Cultural Studies, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi 2005, S. 175- 184)。然而，布迪厄在后记中披露了选择采访者所认识的被采访 者的原因，在那里他也捍卫采访的自主性，反对采访学者的评论 和背景化（Pierre Bourdieu，»Verstehen «，in：ders. u. a.，Das Elend der Welt. Zeugnisse und Diagnosen alltäglichen Leidens an derGesellschaf1,Konstanz1997(frz. 1993),S.779-822)。关于辩 护后期布迪厄的参与，参见：Lothar Peter，»Das Ärgernis Bourdieu: Anmerkungen zu einer Kontroverse «, in; Das Argument 231,1999,S.545-560.\n\n84\n\n什么是批判","previous_page":83,"next_page":85}