{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","uuid":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","normalized_title":"democracyandotherneoliberalfantasiescommunicativecapitalismandleftpolitics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":229,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Democracy%20and%20Other%20Neoliberal%20Fantasies%20Communicative%20Capitalism%20and%20Left%20Politics","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":151,"pdf_page":161,"physical_index":161,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"738f9f05053d962de40961eb93fc0698150a8a1af311a8c1dfc94bd25edd5c99"},"chapter":"Comunicative Capitalism & Left Politics","content":"This combination of certainty and skepticism takes the form of the discourse of the university. We saw in chapter 3 that in university discourse the facts speak for themselves. Experts claim objectivity even as they attempt to overlook the institutional power that supports their claims to expertise. Scientific socialism, the press, and economics are al instances of university discourse. Each emphasizes facts. Facts are supposed to determine outcomes independent of power. Purporting to let the facts speak for themselves, the 9 I 11 truth movem.ent is structured in accordance with university discourse. Yet it lacks its authorizing support (the institutional power we saw Gutmann and Thompson assuming yet ignoring). Accordinglyj I view the movement for 9 I 1 truth as a clone of university discourse, a psychotic done. 8\n\nVhy psychotic? Because of Lacanian psychoanalysis's account of psychosis as a missing signifier, an absence and a foreclosure. The loss of authority on September 11 produced a hole in the already fragile, declining U.S. symbolic order. The Bush administration attempted to fil in that hole by explaining the events of the day in terms of terrorism. The 9 I u truth m.ovement rejects this explanation and builds a discourse around the hole that is left, a response that is psychotic in its formal structure. To hold its speculations together, this psychotic discourse models itself on other, more conventional discourses such as university discourse (hardly a surprise given both the present ubiquity of university discourse and the role of actual university professors in the movement) .\n\nWhile the 9 I 11 truth movement is exemplary of the psychotic cloning of university discourse, the fragile discursive habitats of communicative capitalism increase the likely proliferation of such psychotic clones. Characterized by the circuit of drive, by an intensity, certainty, and skepticism that circles around a fundamental loss, psychotic discourse perpetuates anxiety. It renders all that comes into contact with it suspect, uncertain, permeated with possible meaning. The gap between the oficial story of 9 I 1 and the 9 I 11 truth movement (and reappearing within the movement itself) thus suggests less an engaged political struggle than it does a more debilitating political deadlock that displaces action onto impossible subjects, futures, and terrains. \"What sort of politics is possible when there is knowledge without belie£ when certainty and skepticism persist in tandem, each supporting but imune to the other? And what does any answer to this question entail for aspirations to collective approaches to equity and justice?\n\nCERTAINTY\n\n151","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}