{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","uuid":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","normalized_title":"democracyandotherneoliberalfantasiescommunicativecapitalismandleftpolitics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":229,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Democracy%20and%20Other%20Neoliberal%20Fantasies%20Communicative%20Capitalism%20and%20Left%20Politics","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":165,"pdf_page":175,"physical_index":175,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"68a17091fd64b985b60a590cbf7c331795e86e92f257c1e018bd75178981828e"},"chapter":"Comunicative Capitalism & Left Politics","content":"Santner' s crisis of symbolic investiture deepens and extends Zizek' s account of the decline of symbolic eficiency by connecting the crisis of symbolic investiture to paranoid psychosis. A central lesson of the Schreber case is that a generalized loss of symbolic power can generate feelings of overproximity, in Santner's words, \"loss of distance to so.me obscene and malevolent presence that appears to have a direct hold on one's inner parts\" (xi) . Confronted with the excessive proximity of authority, the subject can't continue to play the game of everyday life, a game that requires it to deny the \"impasses and dilemmas of symbolic power and authority\" ( 144) . The traumatic loss of symbolic authority thus impacts the subject such that he feels this now-missing authority to be all the closer, more powerful, and intrusive. He confronts the irrationality and violence underpinning authority per se-the tautological way we obey law because it is law and accept the judgments of a judge because she is the judge. Santner's psychotic, then, is not delusional because he accepts as certain what is necessarily false but because he denies the falsity, the fiction, the lie necessary for the functioning of the symbolic order. The psychotic doesn't fall for the performative magic of utterances backed by symbolic authority. He focuses instead on the \"rottenness and decay\" that underlies them.\n\nVhat are the implications of the decline of symbolic eficiency and the crisis of symbolic investiture for thinking through the problems posed by the 9/11 truth movement? The decline of symbolic eficiency tags the movement's setting in profound skepticism. Contemporary subjects don't have to believe. They can find out. This skepticism is coupled with a sense of certainty or confidence. Not everything is called into question at the same time, and some sources are more reliable than others. So contemporary Americans might claim media cannot be trusted and support that claim with evidence taken from media they trust. Their trust, however, doesn't travel from one setting to another. Vhat they find to be authoritative, to count as expert knowledge, is similarly limited. The crisis of symbolic investiture highlights the loss of a powerful authority or authorizing power. Subjects respond to this loss by positing an all the more intrusive, invasive, and proximate power, by failing to believe the fiction of the symbolic order and suppress the sense in which it covers over arbitrary power.\n\nCERTAINTY\n\n165","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}