{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","id":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","uuid":"e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title":"Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics","normalized_title":"democracyandotherneoliberalfantasiescommunicativecapitalismandleftpolitics","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":229,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Democracy%20and%20Other%20Neoliberal%20Fantasies%20Communicative%20Capitalism%20and%20Left%20Politics","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/e38ef66b-e3ac-494b-b5ea-9cc05b2975d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":168,"pdf_page":178,"physical_index":178,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d1462ce44c278f8e49c777b7c3d429a08354d3eb0c5b848a9baf441e77ef51fc"},"chapter":"Comunicative Capitalism & Left Politics","content":"Thus far I've emphasized several aspects of the Lacanian account of psychosis: that psychosis is a reaction to a hole or absence, that this reaction takes place on the level of the imaginary, and that it involves certainty, feru; distrust, and a sense of permeating meaning that may be expressed through writing and publication. One additional aspect of Lacan's discussion, an aspect that returns us to the setting of psychosis, is necessary for thinking about 9 I 11 truth as the psychotic clone of university discourse. Lacan writes: \"To be more or less captivated, captured, by a meaning is not the same thing as to express that meaning in a discourse designed to communicate it and reconcile it with other variously received mean).ngs. In this term received lies the driving force of what makes discourse a common discourse, a comonly admitted discourse\" ( 63) . The hole to which the psychotic responds, the hole constitutive of psychosis, is a gap or absence in the \"commonly admited discourse:' Normal subjects don't perceive the hole. For them, the symbolic order is intact and they ignoJ.7e, as best they can, the ruptures of the Real. The psychotic perceives the hole and reacts to it, but he reacts in a way that he can't fully communicate. The image that covers over or takes the place of the hole doesn't function in t4e same way for him as it does for normal subjects because for them its place is already occupied. Thus, they can't reconcile the psychotic's image, no matter how certain it may be, with the other meanings constitutive of reality. It is simply not part of a common discourse.\n\nBut what if discourse is not common? 'What if our conditions are characterized by the decline of symbolic eficiency and the presence of a variety of diferentiated discursive habitats? 'What, in other words, if the words of the government are already greeted with skepticism and doubt? Under the intensely. mediated conditions of communicative capitalism, texts that might once have remained solitary; like Schreber's, can become part of a group, a scene, a genre, a movement, a community. One can discover that one is not alone, that others feel the same way, have the same doubts and suspicions. Schreber's psychotic writings don't establish a social link. Even as he narrates his experience, his writings remain an object within psychoanalytic discourse. Networked information and communication technologies end this isolation, allowing for the emergence of a discourse of the psychotic, a discourse that reacts to a hole with certainty, fear, distrust, and a permeating sense of meaning.\n\n168\n\nSIX","previous_page":167,"next_page":169}