{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":107,"pdf_page":119,"physical_index":119,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"aa62db0724b741c241ce98fd0a74128bd0e4af1c4b4217922069d15f26d95c52"},"chapter":"第二章逻辑与偶然","content":"在谢林和黑格尔那里，有两种不同的递归运作和两种连续性的功能。不过，这两种方法有着相似的任务和认识论范式，即随着生物学或有机科学和化学的兴起、磁和电的发现，本质这个古老概念被重新解释为过程。谢林把偶然性的必然性看作艺术性行动的生产力和创造性的结果，而对黑格尔来说，偶然性的必然性只有在接受逻辑的检验时才有可能。本章有两个目的：首先，我们想就其与偶然性的关系而言，阐释黑格尔的递归概念；其次，我们想看看这种系统建构如何与控制论中的递归概念相关。我们并不认为黑格尔和谢林的有机性概念与递归算法是一样的，而是想表明这里勾勒的轨迹如何有助于反思理念论与当代技术哲学的相关性。如果说谢林的自然哲学是生物有机主义的先驱，黑格尔的逻辑则预示着一种机械有机主义，即控制论。正如希望超越机械论与神秘生机力的理念论那样，控制论希望克服机械论与生机论的对立，并为各个领域提供一种以“自我意识”为特征的操作性逻辑。①\n\n第二章 逻辑与偶然\n\n107\n\n(接上页注)论：德国理念论文集》(Transcendental Ontology：Essays inGerman Idealism，伦敦：Bloomsbury,2013年)第3章中提出，与渴望消除偶然性的黑格尔不同，谢林发展出了一种“偶然性的运动场”(Spiel-raum der Kontingenz)，即“迟来的”(belated)必然性。然而，正如我们讲过的，这种偶然性的运动场早在谢林的自然哲学中就已经存在，他在那里也提出了递归的模型。\n\n① 伯纳德·马比勒(Bernard Mabille),《黑格尔:偶然性的考验》(Hegel: l'épreuve de la contingence),巴黎: Hermann, 2013 年。","previous_page":null,"next_page":108}