{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":144,"pdf_page":156,"physical_index":156,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e1333ef8f70246d0233f9e30bdcf4d5cbf49a9c9e031a4b60ab2b80ec6638b24"},"chapter":"第二章逻辑与偶然","content":"§21 维纳的莱布尼茨主义\n\n不同于冈瑟的是，维纳没有用黑格尔的语言，而是把莱布尼茨当作控制论的守护人。当然，莱布尼茨不是黑格尔，但他们都对存在的有机性及其在反思中的运作有所反思；正因此，冈瑟把维纳的反馈与黑格尔的反思等同了起来。这不是说莱布尼茨是第一个思考数学和逻辑的人。在他之前，笛卡尔已经建构了一套自动机理论。但在莱布尼茨那里，人们能找到对反思模型的数学和物理解释，这种反思模型把无限折叠在有限的存在中，就像最好可能世界的假说和单子论那样。维纳写道：\n\n144\n\n递归与偶然\n\n①王浩，《逻辑之旅》，第291页。","previous_page":143,"next_page":145}