{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":184,"pdf_page":196,"physical_index":196,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fe1f712764605d260666ed82b568011c27c56fcbbb7135344d0e7f5468ba326f"},"chapter":"第三章被组织的无机","content":"维纳断言说控制论已经解决了牛顿时间和伯格森时间的对立，这种说法有道理，也值得被更深入地思考。然而当控制论试图通过模仿来追求有机体和机器的等同性时，它可能依然走在错误的路上，因为这种做法在某种程度上模糊了功能和操作的区别。因此，我们必须批判性地评估对有机和无机的关系的判断，二者的关系不能像在谢林那里一样，只被当作两股潜力，而应当被放入一个解释学循环来考察。从有机主义到器官学的转变表明，必须把有机形式从知识理论提升为生命理论，即另一种递归性。它不是一种朝着有许多反馈循环的全体系统演进的递归，而是把机械递归重新引回地面的递归，这正是生命本身。一般器官学一词是乔治·康吉莱姆在1947年提出的，比维纳《控制论》的发表早一年。康吉莱姆认为亨利·柏格森1907年的《创造进化论》是器官学项目的先驱。这门学科不能简单从赛博格(cyborg)或者通过“计算机控制的生物反馈系统”实现的人类增强的角度来理解。①以这种方式解读康吉莱姆和柏格森，依然同维纳的控制论机器和某种超人类主义太过相似，没有认识到康吉莱姆和柏格森的任务在于让生命优先，使它成为机械化的基础。假如不能批判地重新思考机械化，它便倾向于把人和生命分开。在维纳那里我们很难找到一种生命哲学，尽管在贝特森和二阶控制论中有可能找到，但它尚未是一种器官学。\n\n184\n\n递归与偶然","previous_page":183,"next_page":185}